Qom University Comparative Interpretation Research 2476-4191 7 1 2021 06 22 A Comparative Analysis of the Exegetical Function of Fakhr Rāzi and Ālousi on the Physicality of God A Comparative Analysis of the Exegetical Function of Fakhr Rāzi and Ālousi on the Physicality of God 295 319 1839 10.22091/ptt.2021.5686.1785 FA Mohammad Bozorgzādeh M.A Student in the Qur’an’s Sciences and Hadith, Sistan Balouchestan University Ibrāhim Nouri  Associate Professor at the Department of the Qur’an’s Sciences and Hadith, Sistan Balouchestan University 0000-0003-4474-6341 Hossayn Khākpour Member of scientific board of sistan and Balouchestan University Journal Article 2020 06 28 Received: 2020/9/22  |   Accepted: 2021/2/14 <br />Making a general or particular comparison between two exegeses is among Qur’anic research criticisms in the contemporary era. Regarding the fact that <em>Tafsir Rouh ol-Ma’</em><em>āni</em> from Ālousi, the acclaimed commentator of the 13^th century is recognized as the 2nd version of <em>Tafsir Kabir</em> from Fakhr Rāzi, the eminent theologian of the 6^th century, the present study using a descriptive-analytical approach, attempts to compare the issue of God’s physicality from the view of both above commentators. This research has concluded that both Rāzi and Ālousi acknowledge that God is free from physicality but there are 2 differences between their views: First, Rāzi has emphasized on the infeasibility of this issue and has presented some rational arguments to prove his view while Ālousi has accepted this issue because it is the method of many other outstanding Islamic scholars and does not refer to or emphasize on the infeasibility of God’s physicality. Second, Rāzi has raised this discussion in a way that denotes the preference of hermeneutics in the style of Mu’tazila whereas Ālousi accepts the things that are attributed to God in the Qur’anic verses as well but he delegates determination of meaning to God. He still has a tendency to hermeneutics in some cases though. Furthermore, it should be noted that Ālousi has also criticized the view favored by Rāzi in some places. <br />  <br /><span style="color: #000000;">© Bozorgzādeh, M; Khākpour, H; Nouri, I. (2021) A Comparative Analysis of the Exegetical Function of Fakhr Rāzi and Ālousi on the Physicality of God. </span><em style="color: #000000;">Biannual Journal of Comparative Exegetical Researches, 7 (13) </em><span style="color: #000000;">295-319.  Doi: 10.22091/PTT.2021.5686.1785</span> Received: 2020/9/22  |   Accepted: 2021/2/14 <br />Making a general or particular comparison between two exegeses is among Qur’anic research criticisms in the contemporary era. Regarding the fact that <em>Tafsir Rouh ol-Ma’</em><em>āni</em> from Ālousi, the acclaimed commentator of the 13^th century is recognized as the 2nd version of <em>Tafsir Kabir</em> from Fakhr Rāzi, the eminent theologian of the 6^th century, the present study using a descriptive-analytical approach, attempts to compare the issue of God’s physicality from the view of both above commentators. This research has concluded that both Rāzi and Ālousi acknowledge that God is free from physicality but there are 2 differences between their views: First, Rāzi has emphasized on the infeasibility of this issue and has presented some rational arguments to prove his view while Ālousi has accepted this issue because it is the method of many other outstanding Islamic scholars and does not refer to or emphasize on the infeasibility of God’s physicality. Second, Rāzi has raised this discussion in a way that denotes the preference of hermeneutics in the style of Mu’tazila whereas Ālousi accepts the things that are attributed to God in the Qur’anic verses as well but he delegates determination of meaning to God. He still has a tendency to hermeneutics in some cases though. Furthermore, it should be noted that Ālousi has also criticized the view favored by Rāzi in some places. <br />  <br /><span style="color: #000000;">© Bozorgzādeh, M; Khākpour, H; Nouri, I. (2021) A Comparative Analysis of the Exegetical Function of Fakhr Rāzi and Ālousi on the Physicality of God. </span><em style="color: #000000;">Biannual Journal of Comparative Exegetical Researches, 7 (13) </em><span style="color: #000000;">295-319.  Doi: 10.22091/PTT.2021.5686.1785</span> https://ptt.qom.ac.ir/article_1839_e48f5b874bfc662ea8cecbad736d2d24.pdf