- http://ptt.qom.ac.ir/?lang=en
- Journal of Comparative Interpretation Research is an anonymous and open access journal published by Qom University as the leading university in Quranic theology and science in Iran. This journal is designed to provide an intellectual environment for national and international scholars focusing on interpretative topics. In response to advances in research, this journal has been published in the field of interpretive literature with the aim of publishing quality articles reporting findings related to important issues in the field. F... moreJournal of Comparative Interpretation Research is an anonymous and open access journal published by Qom University as the leading university in Quranic theology and science in Iran. This journal is designed to provide an intellectual environment for national and international scholars focusing on interpretative topics. In response to advances in research, this journal has been published in the field of interpretive literature with the aim of publishing quality articles reporting findings related to important issues in the field.
For the sake of easy and universal access to the latest research findings, this journal is founded as a free access journal. However, the journal does not require a fee to review, process, and publish scholarly articles from authors or research institutions. All the steps mentioned for publishing the article are sponsored by Qom University Press. The Journal of Comparative Interpretation Research is published in both print and online.
This journal has been awarded the scientific-research degree under license no. 3/18/192632 dated 9/9/1995 and has retained its scientific-research rating and is approved by the Ministry of Science and Technology.edit
The Ahādith of Ahl al-Bayt (PBUH) are among the most important resources for exegesis of the Qur'an so the assessment of their credibility can have a tremendous effect on using them in the science of Tafsir. It seems that the comparative... more
The Ahādith of Ahl al-Bayt (PBUH) are among the most important resources for exegesis of the Qur'an so the assessment of their credibility can have a tremendous effect on using them in the science of Tafsir. It seems that the comparative survey of informational and informant validity approaches has significant effects in the validation of exegetical Ahādith. By surveying the above 2 approaches and preferring the informational validity approach based on document study, text study, and reference study, the present article attempts to explain the impact of adopting each of the above approaches and the role of Ahādith in the interpretation of the Qur'an. Using descriptive analysis, this research study explains both of the above approaches and then compares them in terms of exegesis of the Qur'an. The Informant validity approach pays attention to the authority of Āhād news in interpretation of the Noble Qur'an and regarding the preference of information validity approach, the application methods of document study, text study, and reference study are presented.
