A comparative study of Shiite narrative interpretations early and late in the discussion of miracles of the Qur'an in the light of contextual analysis

Document Type : Academicm and Research

Authors

1 PhD student of Quran and Hadith Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Quran and Hadith Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Associate Professor of Research Institute of Human Sciences and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran.

10.22091/ptt.2024.9750.2265

Abstract

The comparison of Shia narrative interpretations and the accuracy of their distinctions shows that the authors of narrative interpretations, like other commentators, influenced by the contextual conditions, have did ijtihad in order to discover the meaning of the verses. through the adaptation of famous Shiite narrative interpretations and the application of the concept of context in author-oriented hermeneutic theories, the difference in the approach of these interpretations to the question of the miracles of the Qur'an is evaluated. The main attention of the authors of the advanced Shia narrative interpretations in various positions, including under the verses of Tahaddi, has been focused on the inner aspects of these verses, which is the common point of considering the matter of Wilayat Ali (AS) as divine. In their interpretations, these commentators did not say anything about the miracle of the Quran. But on the other hand, the authors of later Shia narrative commentaries have spoken about the miracles of the Qur'an with a lot of explanation and detail in the form of their narrations or words and phrases under the mentioned verses. Paying attention to the origins of the theory of miracles of the Qur'an and accuracy in the course of evolution and development of Shia theology topics as influential fields in this difference in approach helps to better understand this difference.

Keywords

Main Subjects


CAPTCHA Image