A comparative study of Al-Mizan's and Al-Furqan's interpretative views on Mu'awztin From the point of view of interpreting the Qur'an to the Qur'an

Document Type : Academicm and Research

Author

qom university theology faculty

10.22091/ptt.2025.8749.2181

Abstract

Applied by different interpreters, interpretation of Quran based on the text of Quran, includes various outlooks. The practice has brought about a variety of new understandings and cognitive achievements in Islamic metaphysics, ethics, and sociology. An example of this variety is discerned in the interpretations of two Short Suras (Naas and Falaq) by two contemporary interpreters of Quran- especially in their metaphysical views on Holy Prophet’s (Muhammad) unique prophethood as well as his infallibility. It is obvious that Al-Furqan, due to its better reliance on Quranic verses, introduced a deeper and clearer analysis of the Holy Prophet’s infallibility. Almizan, however, because of its use of unreliable documents creates a superficial account. It, eventually, based on a few ‌hadiths, adopted the vulnerability of the Holy Prophet’s body against magic. Even if they are reliable at all, these hadiths are regarded as Aahaad. Such a practice is against al-Furqan‌‌‌‌‌'s usual procedure which rejects the reliability of ‌ahaad accounts.

A comparative study of Al-Mizan's and Al-Furqan's interpretative views on Mu'awztin

From the point of view of interpreting the Qur'an to the Qur'an

Keywords

Main Subjects

Send comment about this article
CAPTCHA Image
Comparative Interpretation Research

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 06 May 2025

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics