An Examination of the Disagreement Among Commentators of Both Factions Regarding the Status of the Disciples' Faith in Jesus, under verses 111 and 112 of Surah Al-Ma'idah."

Document Type : Academicm and Research

Authors

1 PhD student of Quran and Hadith Sciences, University of Qom, Qom, Iran

2 Assistant Professor at the University of Qom

10.22091/ptt.2026.14150.2542

Abstract

This research aims to examine the divergent views of Sunni and Shi‘a exegetes concerning the faith status of the disciples (ḥawārīyūn) of Prophet Jesus (peace be upon him). The existence of contrasting interpretations of their faith—from early doubt to steadfast conviction—renders an in-depth inquiry essential. Falling within the field of comparative Qur’anic exegesis, the study’s significance lies in offering a framework to reconcile scholarly disagreements and bring exegetical perspectives closer together.



Employing a descriptive–analytical approach and the contextual (siyaqī) method, it analyzes the relevant verses in Āl ʿImrān, Al-Māʾidah, and As-Ṣaff according to interpretations from both exegetical schools. The findings reveal that various factors—such as neglect of linguistic context and convention, failure to distinguish between literal and metaphorical meaning, historical contradictions, and the role of individual reasoning (ijtihād)—have led to multiple interpretive outcomes.



Ultimately, the study proposes the theory of the evolution of faith as a balanced alternative to previous one-dimensional readings. Through systematic contextual analysis, it shows that the disciples’ faith evolved gradually from initial uncertainty to firm conviction. The Qur’an’s portrayal views temporary weaknesses not as contradictions of ultimate perfection. Thus, this study contributes to synthesizing interpretations and fostering unity in Qur’anic understanding

Keywords

Main Subjects


CAPTCHA Image