عنوان مقاله [English]
It is the overall or partial comparison between the two interpretations is considered as the Qur'anic research critique of the present day. Considering that the interpretation of the Al-Ma'ani has taken the effect of Alousi, the famous commentator of the thirteenth century, The present Judesh has attempted to compare the issue of God's physicality with a descriptive-analytic approach from the point of view of Razi and Alousi. And it is concluded that Razi and Alousi consider the two gods to be divine With the difference that Razi has made it clear that it is impossible to prove, and has provided rational reasons to prove his theory, Alousi, however, accepted the repentance of Allah from the Imam because it is the method of many outstanding scholars of Islam, and its impossibility does not imply any mention or mention.
Secondly, Razi has held a discussion on the verses of the Imamate, which shows the superiority of the Mu'tazilite style of interpretation. Alousi accepts the things that are attributed to the Quran in the verses, but he gives God the right to determine it, although, in some cases it tends to be interprete. In some cases, Razi's favored view has also been criticized.