نوع مقاله : علمی و پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار گروه فقه و حقوق دانشگاه شهرکرد
2 عضو هیات علمی دانشگاه قم
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Cognitive errors and logical fallacies are among the key factors leading to flawed behavior and distorted value judgments. Exploring their mechanisms in unbelief clarifies pathways toward more rational and ethical decision-making. The Qur’an, in numerous verses, addresses the reactions, arguments, and psychological as well as epistemic resistances of disbelievers, polytheists, and hypocrites against divine revelation. This study, through a Qur’anic hermeneutical approach and with reference to cognitive psychology and informal logic, identifies and categorizes such errors. Using an analytic–inferential method and qualitative content analysis of Qur’anic verses, supported by classical exegetical sources, the research highlights major fallacies, including denial, reductionism, self-centered analogies, appeals to tradition and wealth, insult, distortion, selective quotation, false correlations, misinterpretation, and emotional appeals. The findings not only deepen the understanding of fallacious reasoning in Qur’anic discourse but also open avenues for interdisciplinary research—particularly linking Qur’anic studies, cognitive sciences, and critical thinking—while offering systematic strategies to confront distortive discourses at both individual and societal levels.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله